Level 1 rule violations can generally be addressed with non-disciplinary intervention or non-exclusionary discipline consequences. Except in the very limited circumstances described in a subsequent rule found in Level 2, Level 1 rule violations may not result in out-of-school suspension. Examples of a Level 1 rule violation are students not using appropriate language or students not complying with directives.

Level 2 rule violations involve more serious misconduct that may warrant a short-term suspension of up to five school days when, in the judgment of the principal or designee, non-disciplinary interventions and non-exclusionary discipline consequences are insufficient to address the behavior and prevent its recurrence. Principals may impose a short-term suspension of six to 10 days or recommend a long-term suspension of 11 days or more based on one or more aggravating factors regarding the severity of the violation or safety concerns, provided such aggravating factors are listed in the written suspension notice. Examples of this rule violation are fighting or theft.

Level 3 rule violations are more severe in nature and may support long-term suspension. The principal may impose a short-term suspension of 10 days or less or decline to impose any suspension based on mitigating factors. An example of this rule violation is assault on a student.

The only rule in Level 4 is one that reflects a statutory prohibition on the possession of a firearm or destructive device (as defined in the rule) on school property or at a school-sponsored event. State law requires principals to recommend a 365-calendar-day suspension for all violations of this rule. Only the Superintendent or Board of Education may modify this outcome. A Level 4 violation is always extremely serious and is treated as such.

Level 5 allows for expulsion of a student from the district for violation of one or more Level 2, 3 or 4 rules in the code of conduct if the following criteria are met: (1) the student is 14 years old or older; (2) both the principal and superintendent or designee recommend expulsion; (3) the superintendent and Board determine, consistent with the Board’s “Due Process” policy, that there is a significant or important reason not to offer the student alternative education services and; (4) the Board determines, by clear and convincing evidence, that the student’s continued presence in school constitutes a clear threat to the safety of other students or school staff.